When it comes to managing a SQL Server database, many organizations mistakenly believe that once the initial setup is complete, the database will take care of itself. However, this couldn’t be further from the truth. Just like a car needs regular maintenance to keep it running smoothly, a SQL Server database requires ongoing maintenance to ensure optimal performance and reliability.

In a recent blog post by Jose Barreto, he highlights the importance of maintaining SQL databases, specifically in the context of Microsoft Office Sharepoint Server (MOSS) 2007. While MOSS 2007 handles the initial database creation, there are still several maintenance tasks that need to be performed to keep the databases in good health.

Barreto points out that MOSS 2007 can have up to 8 databases if all features are installed. It is crucial to regularly check the databases, their recovery modes, and set up maintenance plans to ensure they are functioning properly. However, even with these steps in place, Barreto emphasizes that having a dedicated Database Administrator (DBA) is the best option. A DBA can design a tailored maintenance and backup scheme for the specific scenario, which may include using the full recovery model and a combination of scheduled full and incremental backups.

It is essential for organizations to understand that relying solely on the initial setup to handle database maintenance is a significant operational risk. Just as a car dealership does not provide ongoing maintenance for a purchased vehicle, a database setup does not guarantee ongoing maintenance. Without proper maintenance, databases can experience performance issues, data corruption, and even complete failure.

This concept applies to all enterprise database platforms, including SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, DB2, and Sybase. Regardless of the platform or version, regular maintenance is necessary to ensure the database’s reliability and performance. Even a Microsoft Access jet database requires occasional Compact & Repair operations.

Furthermore, it is important to note that while newer versions of database platforms may be more reliable and fix bugs found in previous versions, maintenance is still required. For example, SQL Server 2005 may be more robust than SQL Server 2000, but it does not eliminate the need for maintenance.

In conclusion, organizations must recognize the importance of ongoing database maintenance for SQL Server and other enterprise database platforms. Relying solely on the initial setup is not sufficient to ensure optimal performance and reliability. Investing in a dedicated DBA and implementing a comprehensive maintenance and backup strategy is crucial for the long-term success of the database.

Tags: DATABASE, SQL Server, Microsoft SQL Server, SQL Server 2000, SQL Server 2005, MySQL