When it comes to choosing a database management system, cost is often a significant factor to consider. In this article, we will discuss why SQL Server is a more economical choice compared to Oracle.

One of the main reasons why SQL Server is a cost-effective option is its feature-rich nature. Unlike Oracle, which requires multiple add-ons to match the features offered by SQL Server, SQL Server provides a comprehensive set of features out of the box. This means that you don’t have to spend extra money on additional add-ons to get the functionality you need.

Let’s take a look at the pricing comparison between SQL Server and Oracle:

As you can see, the base product of Oracle is already expensive compared to SQL Server. Additionally, to access the same features available in SQL Server Enterprise, you would need to purchase multiple add-ons for Oracle, further increasing the cost. For example, partitioning, which is included in the SQL Server Enterprise edition, requires an additional payment of $11,500 per processor in Oracle.

Furthermore, SQL Server offers many additional add-ons for free in its Enterprise or Standard edition, such as BI Tools. These add-ons, which are often costly in Oracle, provide even more value for your investment in SQL Server.

It’s important to note that the prices mentioned here are as per the current pricing process. For the most up-to-date pricing information, you can refer to the official price lists of SQL Server and Oracle.

In conclusion, SQL Server is not only a feature-rich database management system, but it is also a more economical choice compared to Oracle. With its comprehensive set of features and affordable pricing, SQL Server provides excellent value for businesses of all sizes.

What are your thoughts on this topic? Do you agree that SQL Server is a cost-effective choice? Let us know in the comments below!