Solutions

Recognize the problem. Find a path forward.

When dashboards slow down, reporting strains the application, or event data gets too expensive to keep, the next step is to identify which workload needs a different approach.

Common starting points

What is your team working around today?

These are use-case patterns. The first review checks whether the source of the problem is the database, the pipeline, the application, or a combination.

01

Customers wait for dashboards

Charts time out, filters feel slow, or each new tenant needs more precomputed reports. Explore a dedicated analytical layer for product usage and customer reporting.

  • Test the largest tenants and peak traffic
  • Measure dashboard response and query errors
  • Validate tenant isolation and data freshness
Plan customer-facing analytics
02

Reporting competes with the application

Large scans and aggregations put pressure on SQL Server, PostgreSQL, or MySQL. Evaluate moving selected reporting queries to an analytical copy.

  • Measure source load and reporting demand
  • Plan a supported ingestion or CDC path
  • Test reconciliation, updates, and deletes
Explore analytical offloading
03

Analytics costs keep rising

Growth means higher compute bills, shorter retention, or limits on who can query data. Compare the full cost of the workload on realistic usage.

  • Include ingestion, storage, and data transfer
  • Compare peak usage and growth scenarios
  • Account for engineering time and migration
Read the cost framework
04

You cannot keep enough event history

Logs, traces, and device events grow quickly, while sampling and short retention make investigation harder. Design retention around the questions you need to answer.

  • Identify the fields investigations use
  • Separate raw history from useful rollups
  • Measure search speed and storage growth
Review an event workload
05

Operations see problems too late

Orders, deliveries, devices, or transactions change faster than reports refresh. Define the decision that needs fresher data and the time available to act.

  • Trace the complete event-to-action delay
  • Define who acts on each signal
  • Measure freshness as well as query speed
Build the business case
06

AI usage grows faster than visibility

You need to explain which model, customer, or release is driving errors, latency, or spend. Build an analytical record of requests, traces, evaluations, and outcomes.

  • Connect model events to customer context
  • Compare quality, latency, and cost
  • Apply data minimization and access controls
Explore AI observability
Workload fit

When is ClickHouse worth evaluating?

ClickHouse is a SQL database designed for analytics across large datasets. Its suitability depends on the queries and data lifecycle. Read the official introduction .

A promising fit

You repeatedly filter, group, or aggregate growing event or business datasets, and query speed, freshness, or concurrency has become a material problem.

  • A specific workload with measurable pain
  • Queries over many rows and selected columns
  • A practical way to deliver data continuously

Investigate carefully

Your workload depends on frequent corrections, complex joins, strict consistency, or demanding tenant isolation. These requirements need explicit modeling and testing.

  • Validate update and delete behavior
  • Measure representative joins and skew
  • Check connector and SQL compatibility

You may not need a new database

A small reporting workload, an occasional export, or a problem fixable with an index or query change may be better handled where it is. Keep row-by-row transactions in an appropriate transactional system.

  • Review tuning opportunities first
  • Avoid adding operations without clear value
  • Keep the first migration scope selective

Bring the workaround your team is tired of maintaining.

A few sentences about the problem are enough to start. You do not need to know which ClickHouse features you would use.

Request a fit call